As detailers, we know the importance of clear and logical detailing standards. Yet, these standards often miss the mark, leading to miscommunication, delays, and unnecessary costs. Below are our insights on common mistakes we’ve observed working with different clients:
Not having standards at all
This might seem obvious, but it’s surprisingly common, especially among smaller shops. If you’re relying on outside detailers, it’s crucial to provide them with clear guidelines. It may lead to a great mess when using different detailing companies on the same project, and each uses its own numbering system, drawing naming, title block, and even project name.
Overly complex standards
A 70-page “manuscript” isn’t helpful to anyone. It’s difficult for the detailer to keep track of all the requirements, especially when you work with many different clients. I bet that most of the requirements in those “70-pagers” are just embellishments. Also, do not try to encompass every project-specific case; keep it concise and focus on the essentials.
Not providing standards before you go
This can lead to inaccurate quotes and change orders down the line. Your standards may involve some practices that cannot be supported by detailing software. For example, your typical package structure or how you deal with revision clouds may cause additional time spent on the detailer’s side.
Ignoring Shop Personnel
They’re the ones who will be working with the drawings, so their input is essential. Ask them what they want to see on the drawings and which info is not used at all. Do you really need stringers drawn “In position” with X,Y running dimensions to each carrier angle?
Resistance to Feedback
Detailers may have suggestions for improving your standards, so be open to their input. For example, we often suggest our clients use unique single-part numbers for identical pieces but released in different stages of the project. This simple but fool-proof solution allows for the easy tracking of “on-hold” items, ensuring nothing is forgotten or unnecessarily fabricated.
Not providing a “How-We-Ask-Questions” Protocol
Fabricators should clearly outline how detailers should handle missing information. Should they issue a formal compiled RFI, a bunch of single-question RFIs, or ask for everything on the drawings? or not asking at all? Some fabricators mistakenly believe that asking questions is unprofessional, leading to assumptions and errors. By avoiding these common mistakes, you can create detailing standards that are clear, concise, and easy to follow.
Ever faced issues with detailing standards? Let us know your biggest challenges and tips for improvement in the comments! 👇
#steeldetailing #steelfabrication #construction
